Practitioner Advisory Board members reported learning more about AI and related edtech through their engagement¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the post-participation survey, all six Board members agreed or strongly agreed they learned more about AI and its potential in education. → ai-learning-1

Evidence¶

ai-learning-1¶

Pautz Stephenson, S., Banks, R., & Coenraad, M. (2022, June). Outcomes of increased practitioner engagement in edtech development: How strong, sustainable research-practice-industry partnerships will build a better edtech future. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/158

q2 · i? · design · r2

Post-participation survey of the six Advisory Board members, self-reported learning. The article attributes the learning partly to interaction with learning sciences researchers and industry partners who have "complementary understandings". No effect size is printed.

"In the post-participation survey, all six Board members stated that they either strongly agreed or agreed that through their engagement, they learned more about AI and its potential in education."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Limited device access and a six-month engagement constrained some Board members' contributions, with one member reporting expectations were not met — related
• All six Practitioner Advisory Board members reported that engaging with Merlyn Mind was a valuable use of their time and that their feedback was taken seriously — related
• Participants reported professional growth through networking and collaboration within the RPIP — related
• Industry partners reported learning about working with schools and educators, including contracting and teacher community building — related