All six Practitioner Advisory Board members reported that engaging with Merlyn Mind was a valuable use of their time and that their feedback was taken seriously¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? All six Board members agreed or strongly agreed the engagement was valuable, topics were relevant, and their feedback was taken seriously. → pab-survey-1
Evidence¶
pab-survey-1¶
Pautz Stephenson, S., Banks, R., & Coenraad, M. (2022, June). Outcomes of increased practitioner engagement in edtech development: How strong, sustainable research-practice-industry partnerships will build a better edtech future. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/158
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Post-participation survey of the six-member Merlyn Mind Practitioner Advisory Board, part of the white paper's combination of surveys and interviews. All six members replied "either agree or strongly agree" on value, relevance, and whether feedback was taken seriously. No effect sizes are printed.
"When asked if engaging in the Practitioner Advisory Board was a valuable use of their time, all six Board members replied either agree or strongly agree. All agreed or strongly agreed that the topics they were asked for input on were relevant to them and that their feedback was taken seriously."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Industry partners reported learning about working with schools and educators, including contracting and teacher community building — related
- Limited device access and a six-month engagement constrained some Board members' contributions, with one member reporting expectations were not met — reports the opposite
- Practitioner Advisory Board members reported learning more about AI and related edtech through their engagement — related
- Participants reported professional growth through networking and collaboration within the RPIP — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pab-engagement-mutually-valued |
title |
All six Practitioner Advisory Board members reported that engaging with Merlyn Mind was a valuable use of their time and that their feedback was taken seriously |
description |
All six Practitioner Advisory Board members reported that engaging with Merlyn Mind was a valuable use of their time and that their feedback was taken seriously |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
recheck_by |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pab-survey-1 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.