Claims

Students were highly satisfied with the paired course model and its components, with 100% willing to advise a new student to take the paired courses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? End-of-course satisfaction survey responses were strongly positive across course model and components. → Shaffer 2015

Evidence

Shaffer 2015

Shaffer, S. C., Eshbach, B. E., & Santiago-Blay, J. A. (2015). A Dual Approach to Fostering Under-Prepared Student Success: Focusing on Doing and Becoming. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK5I_68g0X8

q2 · i? · design · r2

An anonymous end-of-course reading satisfaction survey (n = 15, Table 4) printed 79% rating the experience strongly positive, 86% wanting to keep the pairing, 93% wanting to keep ELLI, and 100% advising a new student to take the paired courses.

"students were highly satisfied with the course model and components (see Table 4)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.