Partners in participatory evaluation demonstrated capacities in data engagement, contextual and pedagogical knowledge, and openness and improvement-oriented dispositions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Partner capacities clustered into data-engagement skills, contextual and pedagogical knowledge, and openness-to-learning and improvement-oriented dispositions. → White 2026
Evidence¶
White 2026¶
White, L. P., Gaviria, G. A., & Frausto, A. (2026). Participatory evaluation: The capacities that shape engagement. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/314
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Qualitative analysis of structured reflections gathered from 10 researchers and 11 program designers within the Center for Learner Pathway Innovations, coded within the three dimensions of skills, knowledge, and dispositions. The report states these capacities "most often included skills related to data engagement" and related knowledge and dispositions.
"These capacities most often included skills related to data engagement, knowledge grounded in teaching, coaching, and community contexts, and dispositions such as openness to learning and an orientation to improvement."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Dispositions such as openness and shared responsibility are shaped by conditions, not fixed individual traits — related
- The study's findings derive from structured reflections of 10 researchers and 11 program designers, not direct partner reports — related
- Staff reflections identify partner skills, knowledge, and dispositions that support full participation in Collaborative Innovation — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Evaluator staff capacities centered on creating conditions for participation rather than technical control — related
- Knowledge alone did not ensure meaningful participation; it became influential when clearly communicated and built into programming — related
- Collaborative Innovation tenets varied in visibility: collective ownership and context expertise were most evidenced, reimagining progress least — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
partner-capacities-skills-knowledge-dispositions |
title |
Partners in participatory evaluation demonstrated capacities in data engagement, contextual and pedagogical knowledge, and openness and improvement-oriented dispositions |
description |
Partners in participatory evaluation demonstrated capacities in data engagement, contextual and pedagogical knowledge, and openness and improvement-oriented dispositions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — white-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.