Staff reflections identify partner skills, knowledge, and dispositions that support full participation in Collaborative Innovation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Reflections from 10 researchers and 11 program designers identified partner skills, knowledge, and dispositions supporting full participation in Collaborative Innovation. → Latia P. White 2026
Evidence¶
Latia P. White 2026¶
Latia P. White, Ed. D. (2026). Beyond Participation: The Capacities That Shape Engagement in Collaborative Innovation. Digital Promise, Center for Learner Pathway Innovations. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/e933ec0e-f153-4046-842b-61b696b00ba2 doi:10.51388/20.500.12265/315
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Qualitative analysis of structured reflections from 10 researchers and 11 program designers and implementers, coded within the dimensions of skills, knowledge, and dispositions. The team "developed preliminary codes within the three dimensions named in the research question" and identified recurring patterns. No effect sizes are reported.
"To understand what supports meaningful engagement in Collaborative Innovation, we gathered structured reflections from 10 researchers and 11 program designers and implementers within the Center for Learner Pathway Innovations."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Dispositions such as openness and shared responsibility are shaped by conditions, not fixed individual traits — related
- Knowledge alone did not ensure meaningful participation; it became influential when clearly communicated and built into programming — related
- Partners in participatory evaluation demonstrated capacities in data engagement, contextual and pedagogical knowledge, and openness and improvement-oriented dispositions — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The study's findings derive from structured reflections of 10 researchers and 11 program designers, not direct partner reports — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Evaluator staff capacities centered on creating conditions for participation rather than technical control — related
- Contextual conditions beyond district control shape how a college readiness indicator system can be implemented — related
- Digital education innovations are an interplay of technological, pedagogical, organisational and governance-related dimensions — related
- Deeper co-leadership emerges when staff support lets partners progressively take on responsibility, but recedes when staff carry the process — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
staff-reflections-capacities-collaborative-innovation |
title |
Staff reflections identify partner skills, knowledge, and dispositions that support full participation in Collaborative Innovation |
description |
Staff reflections identify partner skills, knowledge, and dispositions that support full participation in Collaborative Innovation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — latia-p-white-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.