The patience training program produced no significant change in university students' PERMA well-being levels¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Post-test and follow-up comparisons between experimental and control groups showed no significant differences on the PERMA well-being sub-dimensions. → Bülbül and Izgar 2018

Evidence¶

Bülbül and Izgar 2018¶

Ayşe Eliüşük Bülbül, Gö khan Izgar. (2018). Effects of the Patience Training Program on Patience and Well-Being Levels of University Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i1.2900

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Mann-Whitney U tests of post-test and follow-up PERMA Well-being Scale sub-dimension scores between the experimental and control groups. The article states "The results for the sub -dimensions of the Well-being scale were not significant"; equivalence was not tested.

"The results for the sub -dimensions of the Well-being scale were not significant. When Table 4 is examined it can be seen that the difference between the Patience scale sub-dimension scores"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Within the experimental group, patience scores rose significantly from pre-test to post-test while control-group scores did not change — related
• Patience gains from the training program were maintained at the three-month follow-up test — related
• A 5-week patience training program significantly raised all three patience sub-dimension scores of university students compared to a control group at post-test — related