Claims

A 5-week patience training program significantly raised all three patience sub-dimension scores of university students compared to a control group at post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-group students scored significantly higher than control-group students on patience in everyday life, interpersonal patience, and patience in life difficulties after training. → Bülbül and Izgar 2018

Evidence

Bülbül and Izgar 2018

Ayşe Eliüşük Bülbül, Gö khan Izgar. (2018). Effects of the Patience Training Program on Patience and Well-Being Levels of University Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i1.2900

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Mann-Whitney U comparison of post-test Patience Scale scores between the experimental and control groups (15 students each, non-parametric tests used because n<30). All three patience sub-dimensions differed significantly, e.g. "Patience in everyday life (U=168.5, p<.001)".

"the difference between the Patience scale sub-dimension scores of Patience in everyday life (U=168.5, p<.001), İnterpersonal patience (U=127, p<.001), Patience in life difficulties (U=135, p <.001) is significant for the post -test results of the control and experimental groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.