Claims

Patient-satisfaction questionnaires focus strongly on communication skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of 48 items extracted from patient questionnaires, 24 matched the category communication and patient involvement, leading the authors to conclude that communicative competences are clearly in focus of patient satisfaction questionnaires. → Steiner-Hofbauer Verena 2017

Evidence

Steiner-Hofbauer Verena 2017

Steiner-Hofbauer Verena, Schrank Beate, Holzinger Anita. (2017). What is a good doctor? Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0597-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

Item-level extraction from the patient questionnaires among the 20 included sources. The review reports 24 of 48 patient-questionnaire items matched communication and patient involvement, with general interpersonal qualities and medical competence each mentioned "8 times", ethics 7 times, and medical management once.

"We included 48 items out of patient questionnaires; 24 of these items were matched to the category “communication and patient involvement”, “general interpersonal qualities” was mentioned 8 times as was “medical competence” (n = 8)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.