Claims

Doctors rate medical competence and ethics most important and never rank communication first

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Questionnaires and studies targeting doctors' opinions rated medical competence and ethics most important, and in none of the included studies was communication rated as the most important attribute of a good doctor. → Steiner-Hofbauer Verena 2017

Evidence

Steiner-Hofbauer Verena 2017

Steiner-Hofbauer Verena, Schrank Beate, Holzinger Anita. (2017). What is a good doctor? Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0597-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

Synthesis of the doctor-targeted questionnaires and studies among the 20 included sources (e.g. Herzig et al. 2006, Lambe and Bristow 2010, Kim et al. 2015). The review reports doctors valued medical competence and ethics most, with interpersonal qualities and communication "much less valued", and that "In none of the included studies was communication rated as the most important attribute".

"Questionnaires and studies with focus on doctors’ opinions rated “medical competence” and “ethics” most important. “General interpersonal qualities” and “communication and patient involvement” are much less valued."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.