PBL significantly increases student satisfaction compared with traditional teaching in Chinese gynecology and obstetrics education (RR 1.29)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 PBL teaching significantly increased student satisfaction compared with traditional teaching, with a risk ratio of 1.29 and no significant heterogeneity. → Bi S 2021
Evidence¶
Bi S 2021¶
Bi S, Liu R, Li J, Gu J. (2021). The effectiveness of problem-based learning in gynecology and obstetrics education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024660
q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2
Meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials reporting student satisfaction on a dichotomous scale (239 PBL vs 256 traditional participants), after excluding the three most heterogeneous studies. The pooled effect size was risk ratio = 1.29 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.43) with insignificant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).
"the meta-analysis of the student satisfaction found that the PBL teaching model significantly increased student satisfaction compared with the traditional teaching model (risk ratio: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.43, Fig. 5). There was insignificant heterogeneity in pooled effect (I2 = 0%, P = .75)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- PBL significantly increases clinical practice scores compared with traditional teaching in Chinese gynecology and obstetrics education (SMD 2.17) — related
- PBL significantly increases theoretical knowledge scores compared with traditional teaching in Chinese gynecology and obstetrics education (SMD 3.17) — related
- PBL significantly increases clinical operation scores compared with traditional teaching in Chinese gynecology and obstetrics education (SMD 1.15) — related
- PBL-CBL outperforms LBL on subjective comprehensive competencies including self-learning, interest, efficiency, clinical thinking, teamwork, and communication — related
- Students report higher satisfaction with PBL-CBL teaching than with LBL in orthopedic education — related
- More PBL than LBL students report satisfaction with improved self-study ability (RR = 1.44) — related
- SP+CBL pedagogy significantly improves teaching satisfaction compared with LBL in Chinese clinical education. — related
- Student satisfaction does not differ between PBL and LBL (pooled RR 1.18, CI crossing 1) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.