Claims

PBL significantly increases student satisfaction compared with traditional teaching in Chinese gynecology and obstetrics education (RR 1.29)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 PBL teaching significantly increased student satisfaction compared with traditional teaching, with a risk ratio of 1.29 and no significant heterogeneity. → Bi S 2021

Evidence

Bi S 2021

Bi S, Liu R, Li J, Gu J. (2021). The effectiveness of problem-based learning in gynecology and obstetrics education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024660

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials reporting student satisfaction on a dichotomous scale (239 PBL vs 256 traditional participants), after excluding the three most heterogeneous studies. The pooled effect size was risk ratio = 1.29 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.43) with insignificant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%).

"the meta-analysis of the student satisfaction found that the PBL teaching model significantly increased student satisfaction compared with the traditional teaching model (risk ratio: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.43, Fig. 5). There was insignificant heterogeneity in pooled effect (I2 = 0%, P = .75)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.