Claims

More PBL than LBL students report satisfaction with improved self-study ability (RR = 1.44)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A higher proportion of PBL than LBL participants reported that PBL strongly influenced their self-study ability (72.8% vs 54.7%; RR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.16–1.79). → Yang X 2024

Evidence

Yang X 2024

Yang X, Yang Z, Ma S, Yan M, Yang Y. (2024). Evaluation of problem-based learning for pharmacology based on a comprehensive analysis in undergraduate students. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039376

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Meta-analysis of 6 studies involving 939 students reporting satisfaction with improved self-study ability, pooled with a random-effects model. The pooled risk ratio favored PBL: "RR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.16, 1.79], P = .0008, I2 = 84%"; no standardized effect size was printed for this outcome.

"We found that a higher proportion of participants thought that the PBL method strongly influenced their self-study ability (72.8% in the PBL group vs 54.7% in the LBL group, RR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.16, 1.79], P = .0008, I2 = 84%) when compared to the LBL method in random-effects model."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.