More PBL than LBL students report satisfaction with improved self-study ability (RR = 1.44)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A higher proportion of PBL than LBL participants reported that PBL strongly influenced their self-study ability (72.8% vs 54.7%; RR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.16–1.79). → Yang X 2024
Evidence¶
Yang X 2024¶
Yang X, Yang Z, Ma S, Yan M, Yang Y. (2024). Evaluation of problem-based learning for pharmacology based on a comprehensive analysis in undergraduate students. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039376
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Meta-analysis of 6 studies involving 939 students reporting satisfaction with improved self-study ability, pooled with a random-effects model. The pooled risk ratio favored PBL: "RR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.16, 1.79], P = .0008, I2 = 84%"; no standardized effect size was printed for this outcome.
"We found that a higher proportion of participants thought that the PBL method strongly influenced their self-study ability (72.8% in the PBL group vs 54.7% in the LBL group, RR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.16, 1.79], P = .0008, I2 = 84%) when compared to the LBL method in random-effects model."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students report higher satisfaction with PBL-CBL teaching than with LBL in orthopedic education — related
- More PBL than LBL students report satisfaction with improved communication skills (RR = 1.66) — related
- More PBL than LBL students report satisfaction with improved comprehension of knowledge (RR = 1.84) — related
- More PBL than LBL students report satisfaction with improved learning interest (RR = 2.08) — related
- PBL-CBL outperforms LBL on subjective comprehensive competencies including self-learning, interest, efficiency, clinical thinking, teamwork, and communication — related
- In Chinese neurology education, TBL alone or combined with other methods is associated with improved self-study ability, communication skills, and teamwork ability versus LBL — related
- More PBL than LBL students report satisfaction with improved thinking ability (RR = 1.42) — related
- PBL significantly increases student satisfaction compared with traditional teaching in Chinese gynecology and obstetrics education (RR 1.29) — related
- Student satisfaction does not differ between PBL and LBL (pooled RR 1.18, CI crossing 1) — related
- Questionnaire surveys favor PBL over LBL for theoretical knowledge mastery, clinical diagnostic thinking, teamwork, problem solving, document consultation, learning interest, and learning efficiency — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.