Claims

Students taught with the PBLCS model developed higher intrapersonal intelligence than students taught with traditional learning strategies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The development level of students' intrapersonal intelligence under PBLCS was better than under traditional learning strategies, with significance 0.000 < α = 0.05. → Talib and Bini Kailani 2014

Evidence

Talib and Bini Kailani 2014

Ahmad Talib, Ismail Bin Kailani. (2014). Problem Based Learning in Cooperative Situation (PBLCS) and Its Impact on Development of Personal Intelligence. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 3(4). http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment, 103 treated and 103 controlled students; MANOVA univariate test for KIRA gave F = 99.406, sig. 0.000 (Table 6). Descriptive means were 9.21 (treated) versus 0.28 (controlled), the treated class higher.

"The development level of students' intrapersonal intelligence, using of problem-based learning in a cooperative situation model was better than students using traditional learning strategies, with the significance 0.000 <α = 0.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.