Interpersonal intelligence development was higher in regular schools while intrapersonal development was higher in top schools¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Mean interpersonal intelligence development was higher for regular-school students (5.03) than top-school students (4.51). → Talib and Bini Kailani 2014
q2 i? Mean intrapersonal intelligence development was higher for top-school students (8.36) than regular-school students (2.89). → Talib and Bini Kailani 2014 (2)
Evidence¶
Talib and Bini Kailani 2014¶
Ahmad Talib, Ismail Bin Kailani. (2014). Problem Based Learning in Cooperative Situation (PBLCS) and Its Impact on Development of Personal Intelligence. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 3(4). http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive comparison across school levels (N = 70 top-school, 136 regular-school students, Table 3): mean KIER development 4.51 (SU) versus 5.03 (SB). The article reports no significance test for this contrast.
"the mean score of interpersonal intelligence of regular school level students was higher than top level school students."
Talib and Bini Kailani 2014 (2)¶
Ahmad Talib, Ismail Bin Kailani. (2014). Problem Based Learning in Cooperative Situation (PBLCS) and Its Impact on Development of Personal Intelligence. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 3(4). http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive comparison across school levels (Table 4): mean KIRA development 8.36 (SU) versus 2.89 (SB), top school higher. The article reports no significance test for this contrast.
"This means that the mean score of intrapersonal intelligence at top school student was higher than the mean scores of regular school students."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students taught with the PBLCS model developed higher interpersonal intelligence than students taught with traditional learning strategies — related
- Learning method has a significant multivariate effect on the combined personal intelligence outcomes (interpersonal and intrapersonal) — related
- Students taught with the PBLCS model developed higher intrapersonal intelligence than students taught with traditional learning strategies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.