Claims

Scientists with a Ph.D. in physics are less accurate when judging the scientific value of incongruent statements that trigger naive ideas than matched congruent statements, in both physics and biology

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In physics, accuracy was lower for incongruent than congruent statements (d = 1.7). → Geneviève Allaire-Duquette 2021 q3 i3 In biology, accuracy was also lower for incongruent than congruent statements (d = 1.5). → Geneviève Allaire-Duquette 2021

Evidence

Geneviève Allaire-Duquette 2021

Geneviève Allaire-Duquette, Lorie-Marlène Brault Foisy, Patrice Potvin, Martin Riopel, Marilyne Larose, Steve Masson. (2021). An fMRI study of scientists with a Ph.D. in physics confronted with naive ideas in science. npj Science of Learning 6:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00091-x

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Statement-verification task with 25 Ph.D. physicists scanned in an fMRI block-design experiment; accuracy (percent correct) on congruent vs incongruent statements. Physics: "t(24) = 8.522, p < 0.001, d = 1.7"; biology accuracy also significantly lower for incongruent statements (d = 1.5; chance = 50%).

"In physics and biology, participants were more accurate at verifying the scienti fic value of the congruent statements relative to incongruent ones (Fig. 1b). (Physics: t(24) = 8.522, p < 0.001, d = 1.7, CI 95% [11.8, 19.4]; x̄congruent 96.3 ± 4.9%; x̄incongruent 80.6 ± 10.6%."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.