Claims

Senior secondary students taught current electricity with the Polya Problem-Solving Model performed better on the PTCE than students taught by lecture method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students exposed to the Polya Problem-Solving Model significantly outperformed students exposed to lecture method on the Performance Test on Current Electricity after a six-week intervention. → Olaniyan 2015

Evidence

Olaniyan 2015

Olaniyan, Ademola Olatide, Omosewo, Esther O., & Nwankwo, Levi I. (2015). Effect of polya problem-solving model on senior secondary school students' performance in current electricity. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 97-104. https://ojcs.siue.edu/ojs/index.php/ejsme

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental, non-randomized non-equivalent pre-test post-test control group study with 120 S.S.2 physics students in two purposively selected schools; ANCOVA of post-test scores gave a significant treatment effect, "P value (.022)". Post-test means were 33.40 (Polya) versus 12.30 (lecture).

"The result in table 2 showed the P value (.022) is less than P alpha level of 0.050, (P < 0.050). This suggests that the Hypothesis HO1 was rejected. There was significant difference in the performance of students exposed to Polya, Problem-Solving Models and Lecture method in Performance Test on Current Electricity."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.