Claims

No significant performance difference between male and female students taught with the Polya Problem-Solving Model

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among students taught with the Polya Problem-Solving Model, there was no significant difference between male and female students' post-test performance. → Olaniyan 2015

Evidence

Olaniyan 2015

Olaniyan, Ademola Olatide, Omosewo, Esther O., & Nwankwo, Levi I. (2015). Effect of polya problem-solving model on senior secondary school students' performance in current electricity. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 97-104. https://ojcs.siue.edu/ojs/index.php/ejsme

q2 · i? · causal · r1

ANCOVA on post-test scores of the 60 experimental-group students taught with the Polya model found no significant gender effect, "P value (.951)". Mean gain scores were 9.33 for males (n=43) and 9.89 for females (n=17), a difference of 0.56.

"P value (.951) is greater than P alpha level of 0.05, (P>0.050), the null hypothesis was not rejected thus there was no significant difference in the performance of male and female students taught using Polya Problem-Solving Model."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.