Positive adaptation showed the highest temporal stability while maladaptive adaptation was the least stable profile across the semester¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Learners in the positive adaptation profile were most likely to remain in it (84.6% T1→T2, 83.6% T2→T3), whereas maladaptive adaptation stability was 51.8% and 59.2%. → Wu Y 2026

Evidence¶

Wu Y 2026¶

Wu Y (2026) Profiles and transitions of psychological adaptation in AI-assisted Japanese language learning. Front. Psychol. 17:1837484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1837484

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Latent profile transition analysis of the three-wave panel; transition probabilities (Table 7) show positive adaptation stability of 84.6% and 83.6%, moderate adaptation 72.9% and 74.0%, and maladaptive adaptation 51.8% and 59.2% across the two intervals.

"Learners in the positive adaptation profileshowedthehighesttemporalstability,with84.6%remaining in the same profile from Time 1 to Time 2 and 83.6% remaining stablefromTime2toTime3."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Three latent profiles of psychological adaptation to AI-assisted Japanese learning (maladaptive, moderate, positive) are identified at each of three waves — related
• During a year-long AI curriculum, most students maintained or moved upward in motivational profile, with substantial upward transitions out of the Disengaged profile — related
• At Time 3, profile membership was significantly associated with Japanese learning self-efficacy and learning burnout, with all three profiles differing pairwise — related
• Students' roles showed strong temporal stability: each trajectory returned to its initial roles across the 13 weeks, which the authors interpret as stable collaborative dispositions. — related