During a year-long AI curriculum, most students maintained or moved upward in motivational profile, with substantial upward transitions out of the Disengaged profile¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Transition probabilities showed moderate stability with notable upward transitions: 43% of Disengaged students moved to Developing and 21% directly to Self-Determined, while the Self-Determined profile was most stable (80%). → Liang 2026
Evidence¶
Liang 2026¶
Liang, S., Yau, K. W., Meng, H., Chiu, T. K. F., King, I., Yam, Y., & Chai, C. S. (2026). From disengaged to self-determined: A latent transition analysis of students' AI learning motivation. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13998-y
q2 · i? · associational · r3
Latent transition analysis of 2,086 students across one academic year estimated T1-to-T2 transition probabilities (Table 7). The quote reports the "substantial upward trend" out of the Disengaged profile; the article also reports 64% stability for Developing, 80% for Self-Determined, and only 2% downward from Self-Determined to Disengaged.
"Students in the Disengaged group showed substantial upward trend, with 43% transitioning to the Developing profile and 21% progressing directly to the Self-Determined profile, while 36% remained in the same profile."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students who transitioned into or remained in the Self-Determined profile showed the greatest improvements in AI literacy — related
- Secondary students in AI learning fall into three distinct SDT-based motivational profiles — Disengaged, Developing, and Self-Determined — at both pre- and post-test — related
- Greater prior AI learning experience and female gender predicted upward motivational profile transitions — related
- Full structural similarity of motivational profiles across time was not supported, indicating profile indicator means changed over the curriculum year — related
- Positive adaptation showed the highest temporal stability while maladaptive adaptation was the least stable profile across the semester — related
- Latent profile analysis of pre-service teachers' CT skills identifies three profiles (Novice, Developing, Proficient), revealing heterogeneous, non-linear skill acquisition — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
upward-motivational-transitions-year-ai-curriculum |
title |
During a year-long AI curriculum, most students maintained or moved upward in motivational profile, with substantial upward transitions out of the Disengaged profile |
description |
During a year-long AI curriculum, most students maintained or moved upward in motivational profile, with substantial upward transitions out of the Disengaged profile |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — liang-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.