Three latent profiles of psychological adaptation to AI-assisted Japanese learning (maladaptive, moderate, positive) are identified at each of three waves¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Latent profile analyses on five technostress dimensions and resilience yielded a best-fitting three-profile solution at each wave, labeled maladaptive, moderate, and positive adaptation. → Wu Y 2026
Evidence¶
Wu Y 2026¶
Wu Y (2026) Profiles and transitions of psychological adaptation in AI-assisted Japanese language learning. Front. Psychol. 17:1837484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1837484
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Latent profile analyses at each of three waves using five technostress dimensions and resilience as indicators; the three-profile solution had the lowest information criteria, entropy of 0.906 (T1), 0.879 (T2), and 0.929 (T3), and significant LMR and BLRT results.
"At Time 1, the three-profile model yielded lower AIC, BIC, and adjusted BIC values than the one- and two-profile models, together with high classification accuracy (entropy= 0.906) and significant LMR and BLRT results."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Higher self-rated Japanese proficiency, more frequent AI use, and prior AI-related training predicted membership in the positive versus maladaptive adaptation profile at Time 1 — related
- Positive adaptation showed the highest temporal stability while maladaptive adaptation was the least stable profile across the semester — related
- At Time 3, profile membership was significantly associated with Japanese learning self-efficacy and learning burnout, with all three profiles differing pairwise — related
- Trust and intrinsic motivation means rose across the semester while extrinsic motivation stayed relatively stable, and longitudinal measurement invariance held across waves — related
- Latent learner profiles did not moderate the effectiveness of the adaptive ITS — related
- Latent transition analysis extracted four ability-profiles of hypothesis-based reasoning across affirmative, refuting, and irrelevant evidence — related
- Latent profile analysis of six AI-attitude indicators yields four profiles: Positive Empowerment, Anxious Acceptance, Low-Perception Detached, and High-Perception High-Vigilance — related
- Latent profile analysis identifies three career adapt-abilities subgroups (low, moderate, high) among English majors — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
three-adaptation-profiles-ai-japanese-learning |
title |
Three latent profiles of psychological adaptation to AI-assisted Japanese learning (maladaptive, moderate, positive) are identified at each of three waves |
description |
Three latent profiles of psychological adaptation to AI-assisted Japanese learning (maladaptive, moderate, positive) are identified at each of three waves |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2031 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wu-y-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.