AI-attitude profiles differ significantly in career crafting, with High-Perception High-Vigilance and Positive Empowerment highest and Low-Perception Detached lowest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The omnibus Wald test indicated significant profile differences in career crafting. → Song Hongfeng 2026
q3 i? High-Perception High-Vigilance and Positive Empowerment did not differ significantly from each other but both exceeded Anxious Acceptance and Low-Perception Detached on career crafting. → Song Hongfeng 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Song Hongfeng 2026¶
Song Hongfeng, Hu Anqi, Li Xueyan. (2026). Beyond Positive or Negative: Latent Profiles of University Students’ AI Attitude and Their Career-Development Correlates. Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091460
q3 · i? · associational · r2
BCH auxiliary analyses comparing Wave 3 career outcomes across the four profiles, adjusting for classification uncertainty; the omnibus test for career crafting was significant.
"The omnibus Wald tests indicated significant profile differences in career crafting, χ2(3) = 52.841, p < 0.001, and self-perceived employability, χ2(3) = 27.734, p < 0.001."
Song Hongfeng 2026 (2)¶
Song Hongfeng, Hu Anqi, Li Xueyan. (2026). Beyond Positive or Negative: Latent Profiles of University Students’ AI Attitude and Their Career-Development Correlates. Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091460
q3 · i? · associational · r2
BCH-adjusted pairwise comparisons (Table 6) of career crafting means across profiles; Anxious Acceptance also exceeded Low-Perception Detached.
"For career crafting, High-Perception High-Vigilance (M = 4.22) and Positive Empowerment (M = 3.91) did not differ significantly, but both reported higher levels than Anxious Acceptance (M = 3.69) and Low-Perception Detached (M = 3.41)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Latent profile analysis of six AI-attitude indicators yields four profiles: Positive Empowerment, Anxious Acceptance, Low-Perception Detached, and High-Perception High-Vigilance — related
- The High-Perception High-Vigilance profile combines elevated AI use anxiety and STARA awareness with strong capability perceptions and AI creative self-efficacy — related
- Profiles also differ in self-perceived employability, and elevated AI-related threat is not necessarily incompatible with career preparation — related
- Learning agility, digital literacy, future work self salience, and perceived university digital support prospectively differentiate AI-attitude profile membership, especially separating Low-Perception Detached from engaged profiles — related
- Higher academic self-efficacy profiles report greater overall academic AI use, with a large effect (η² = .36) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
profiles-differ-in-career-crafting |
title |
AI-attitude profiles differ significantly in career crafting, with High-Perception High-Vigilance and Positive Empowerment highest and Low-Perception Detached lowest |
description |
AI-attitude profiles differ significantly in career crafting, with High-Perception High-Vigilance and Positive Empowerment highest and Low-Perception Detached lowest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — song-hongfeng-2026, song-hongfeng-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.