Mean solution time almost perfectly predicts item-level Suddenness and Certainty, and fast performance signals easy items while deliberation signals hard ones¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 The correlation of solution time with RAPM score differed between the easiest five items (r = −.126) and the hardest five items (r = .377). → Adam Chuderski 2021
Evidence¶
Adam Chuderski 2021¶
Adam Chuderski, Jan Jastrzębski, Bartłomiej Kroczek, Hanna Kucwaj, Michał Ociepka. (2021). Metacognitive experience on Raven’s matrices versus insight problems. Metacognition and Learning 16:15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09236-6
q2 · i1 · associational · r2
Exploratory correlational analysis across the 100 participants: solution time correlated negatively with RAPM score on the five easiest items (r = −.126) but positively on the five hardest items (r = .377, BF10 > 999), meaning effective performance indicated rapidness on easy problems but deliberation on difficult ones.
"a reliable difference was found between a negative correlation of ST with the total RAPM score on the easiest five items, r = −.126, and its positive correlation on the hardest five items, r = .377, BF 10 > 999"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Subjective experience on the easiest RAPM items matches that of insight problems, while difficult items resemble analytic problems — related
- Correct RAPM solutions yield higher Suddenness and Certainty and lower Intuition than incorrect solutions, with a Certainty-by-difficulty interaction — related
- Across participants, RAPM scores correlate positively with Certainty but not with Intuition or Suddenness — related
- Suddenness and Certainty ratings decrease as RAPM item difficulty increases, with Certainty showing a strong effect — related
- Nasty task environments increased negative affect and improved complex problem solving performance relative to nice environments — related
- Intuition ratings are unaffected by RAPM item difficulty, indicating stable strategy across items — related
- The four-dimensional subjective-experience ratings are validated against classic insight and analytic problems, with Intuition and Suddenness differentiating the problem categories — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
solution-time-predicts-insight-like-ratings |
title |
Mean solution time almost perfectly predicts item-level Suddenness and Certainty, and fast performance signals easy items while deliberation signals hard ones |
description |
Mean solution time almost perfectly predicts item-level Suddenness and Certainty, and fast performance signals easy items while deliberation signals hard ones |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — adam-chuderski-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.