Claims

Reading Apprenticeship® shows uncertain effects on reading comprehension across five studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The average effect of Reading Apprenticeship® on reading comprehension across five studies was not statistically significant (summary effect size 0.04, improvement index +1, p=0.07), yielding a WWC rating of uncertain effects. → What Works Clearinghouse 2023

Evidence

What Works Clearinghouse 2023

What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Reading Apprenticeship®. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/727

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

WWC synthesis across 5 studies meeting standards (20,716 students) using five comprehension measures including the ETS Global Integrated Scenario-Based Assessment, CST Reading Comprehension, and GRADE subtest; the printed summary is 0.04, +1, not significant (p=0.07).

"Summary for reading comprehension: Uncertain effects 0.04 +1 No (p=0.07)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id reading-apprenticeship-uncertain-reading-comprehension
title Reading Apprenticeship® shows uncertain effects on reading comprehension across five studies
description Reading Apprenticeship® shows uncertain effects on reading comprehension across five studies
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — what-works-clearinghouse-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.