Claims

Reading Apprenticeship® shows uncertain effects on life sciences achievement in one study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The effect of Reading Apprenticeship® on life sciences achievement (CST biology) was not statistically significant (effect size 0.16, improvement index +7, p=0.27), so the WWC assigns uncertain effects. → What Works Clearinghouse 2023

Evidence

What Works Clearinghouse 2023

What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2023). Reading Apprenticeship®. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/727

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

WWC synthesis of 1 study meeting standards with reservations (Greenleaf et al., 2009; 1,172 students in grades 9 and 10 in 45 California schools, original professional development package); the printed summary is 0.16, +7, not significant (p=0.27).

"Summary for life sciences: Uncertain effects 0.16 +7 No (p=0.27)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id reading-apprenticeship-uncertain-life-sciences
title Reading Apprenticeship® shows uncertain effects on life sciences achievement in one study
description Reading Apprenticeship® shows uncertain effects on life sciences achievement in one study
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — what-works-clearinghouse-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.