Claims

Score distributions differed: the experimental class majority scored in the 80–90 range (49%) while the control class majority scored in the 70–80 range (64%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental class's scores were majority (49%) in the range 80 < n ≤ 90, while the control class's majority were in the range 70 < n ≤ 80 (64%). → Setiyo Prajoko 2017

Evidence

Setiyo Prajoko 2017

Setiyo Prajoko, Mohamad Amin, Fatchur Rohman, Muhana Gipayana. (2017). The Usage of Recycle Materials for Science Practicum: Is There Any Effect on Science Process Skills? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol.6, No.1. http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Histogram distribution of science process skills test scores for the two classes (Figure 2). The article reports the experimental class majority (49%) in the 80 < n ≤ 90 range and the control class majority (64%) in the 70 < n ≤ 80 range. Descriptive percentages only; no effect size.

"Distribution science process skills test scores of the experimental class majority (49%) in the value range of 80 < n ≤ 90, while the control class majority in the value ra nge 70 < n ≤ 80 (64%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.