Claims

Experimental-class students scored higher on average (78 vs 70) on the science process skills test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental class averaged 78 on the science process skills test while the control class averaged 70; the article also states these averages were not significantly different. → Setiyo Prajoko 2017

Evidence

Setiyo Prajoko 2017

Setiyo Prajoko, Mohamad Amin, Fatchur Rohman, Muhana Gipayana. (2017). The Usage of Recycle Materials for Science Practicum: Is There Any Effect on Science Process Skills? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol.6, No.1. http://iaesjournal.com/online/index.php/IJERE

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive results from the randomized posttest-only study (Table 2): experimental class maximum 90, minimum 54, average 78; control class maximum 79, minimum 55, average 70. The article prints "The average score of the experimental class was 78, while the average score of the control class was 70". Descriptive means only; no effect size.

"The average score of the experimental class was 78, while the average score of the control class was 70."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.