RIDE-instructed dyads more often use elicitative, responsive, confirmation/acceptance, and asking-for-action communicative activities¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Four groups of communicative activities were significantly more frequent in the experimental group than in the control group. → Saab 2007

Evidence¶

Saab 2007¶

Saab, N., van Joolingen, W. R. & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2007). Supporting Communication in a Collaborative Discovery Learning Environment: the Effect of Instruction. Instructional Science 35:73–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9003-4

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mann–Whitney U-tests on absolute chat frequencies from 17 experimental versus 12 control dyads working 90 minutes in Collisions; elicitative p = 0.027, responsive p = 0.015, confirmation/acceptance p = 0.017, asking for action p = 0.017.

"From Table 3, we see that four groups of communicative activities are significantly more frequently used in the experimental group than in the control group: elicitative, responsive, confirmative/acceptance activities, and asking for action."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Communicative activities associated with the RIDE rules, especially Intelligent collaboration, correlate with discovery learning activities in both groups — related
• RIDE instruction leads to more frequent use of the communicative activities associated with the Deciding together and Encouraging rules — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• RIDE instruction increases some transformative discovery activities and overall regulative discovery activity, with effects limited to specific activities — related
• Instruction plus the reflection tool improved vocational students' actual collaborative chat behavior compared with control, but instruction alone did not demonstrate any desired collaborative behaviors more often than control — related
• RIDE communication instruction and RIDE plus CHT both increase team regulation relative to no support — related