Claims

Trainees report higher satisfaction with simulation-based learning than with non-simulation-based learning in endocrinology education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Count-data studies showed higher satisfaction with SBL (RR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.28–1.60, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%), and continuous-data studies showed SMD = 0.51 (95% CI 0.28–0.74, P < 0.0001, I2 = 16%). → Wu Zeyu 2024

Evidence

Wu Zeyu 2024

Wu Zeyu, Huang Yiling, Lyu Ling, Huang Yu, Ping Fan. (2024). The efficacy of simulation-based learning versus non-simulation-based learning in endocrinology education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06010-z

q3 · i2 · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of eight RCTs reporting teaching satisfaction, split into count-data (six studies, RR = 1.43) and continuous-data (two studies, SMD = 0.51) syntheses. "The combined results consistently indicated higher satisfaction among participants with SBL methods."

"six studies [16, 17, 22, 29, 31, 35] presenting count data (RR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.28–1.60, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) (additional file 3) and two studies [18, 28] presenting continuous data (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28–0.74, P < 0.0001, I2 = 16%)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.