Claims

SBL is the highest-ranked strategy for medical students' satisfaction, significantly exceeding PBL and TBL as well as LBL

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In the network meta-analysis of 13 satisfaction studies (849 students), SBL ranked highest (SUCRA 96.2%), significantly outperforming PBL (SMD = 1.62), TBL (2.77), and LBL (2.64). → Zhang Shuai-Long 2024

Evidence

Zhang Shuai-Long 2024

Zhang Shuai-Long, Ren Si-Jing, Zhu Dong-Mei, Liu Tian-Yao, Wang Lian, Zhao Jing-Hui, Fan Xiao-Tang, Gong Hong. (2024). Which novel teaching strategy is most recommended in medical education? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06291-4

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3

Network meta-analysis of 13 studies encompassing 849 students reporting satisfaction scores. Printed effect sizes: SBL versus PBL SMD = 1.62 and versus TBL SMD = 2.77; SBL (2.64, 95% CI 1.28–4.00), FC (1.34) and PBL (1.02) also beat LBL; SUCRA showed "a high probability (96.2) that SBL would most significantly enhance student satisfaction scores".

"the students’ satisfaction scores were significantly higher in students learning with SBL strategy than in those students learning with PBL (1.62, 95% CI (0.01 to 3.22)) and TBL (2.77, 95% CI (0.43 to 5.11))."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.