Only 29% of control agricultural education teachers used the Science-in-CTE method and lessons one year later¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Of the seven control agricultural education teachers who taught explicit science a year after the pilot, only two (29%) used the Science-in-CTE method and lessons in their curricula. → Wendi Mizer Stachler 2013
Evidence¶
Wendi Mizer Stachler 2013¶
Wendi Mizer Stachler, R. Brent Young, Mari Borr. (2013). Sustainability of professional development to enhance student achievement: A shift in the professional development paradigm. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(4), 13-30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1122391
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Questionnaire data from 10 of 14 control agricultural education teachers, who received only one debriefing session rather than the seven-day professional development. "only two (29%) of those teachers indicated that they had used the Science -in-CTE method and lessons".
"The remaining seven (70%) control agricultural education teachers indicated they had taught explicit science a year after the pilot study, but only two (29%) of those teachers indicated that they had used the Science -in-CTE method and lessons in their curricula."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- 92% of experimental agricultural education teachers continued using Science-in-CTE materials one year after the pilot study — related
- Sustained usage rates in Science-in-CTE were consistent with those reported in the Math-in-CTE follow-up study — related
- 80% of partnered science teachers voluntarily incorporated Science-in-CTE methods or examples into their science classes — related
- The authors argue STEM content incorporation in agricultural teacher education is appropriate because agriculture is an applied science — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.