Claims

92% of experimental agricultural education teachers continued using Science-in-CTE materials one year after the pilot study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of the 13 experimental agricultural education teachers who taught explicit science and received a personal follow-up interview, 12 (92%) used a combination of Science-in-CTE materials including the science-enhanced lessons and the pedagogical model one year later. → Wendi Mizer Stachler 2013

Evidence

Wendi Mizer Stachler 2013

Wendi Mizer Stachler, R. Brent Young, Mari Borr. (2013). Sustainability of professional development to enhance student achievement: A shift in the professional development paradigm. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(4), 13-30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1122391

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Follow-up questionnaire and personal interview data from the 15 experimental agricultural education teachers (N = 15 responding) one year after the Science-in-CTE pilot. Thirteen (86.7%) taught explicit science; of the 13 interviewed, "12 (92%) used a combination of Science-in-CTE materials".

"Therefore, of the 13 experimental teachers who taught explicit science and received a personal follow -up interview, 12 (92%) used a combination of Science-in-CTE materials that included the science-enhanced lessons and the pedagogical model."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.