Sustained usage rates in Science-in-CTE were consistent with those reported in the Math-in-CTE follow-up study¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The 92% treatment usage rate in Science-in-CTE was consistent with the 73% reported for Math-in-CTE treatment teachers, and the 29% control rate was similar to the 27% Math-in-CTE control rate. → Wendi Mizer Stachler 2013

Evidence¶

Wendi Mizer Stachler 2013¶

Wendi Mizer Stachler, R. Brent Young, Mari Borr. (2013). Sustainability of professional development to enhance student achievement: A shift in the professional development paradigm. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(4), 13-30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1122391

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The authors' comparison of this follow-up study's usage rates with those reported in the Math-in-CTE follow-up study (Lewis & Pearson, 2007), citing its tables. "consistent with the 73% usage from teachers in the treatment group"; science teachers' 80% usage compared to 66% for math teachers.

"The number of CTE teachers in the treatment group (92%) who continued to use the methods and lessons one year after the pilot study concluded was consistent with the 73% usage from teachers in the treatment group reported in the Math -in-CTE follow -up study"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Only 29% of control agricultural education teachers used the Science-in-CTE method and lessons one year later — related
• 92% of experimental agricultural education teachers continued using Science-in-CTE materials one year after the pilot study — related
• 80% of partnered science teachers voluntarily incorporated Science-in-CTE methods or examples into their science classes — related