Claims

Scientific inquiry learning model based on conceptual change improves science process skills better than conventional learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students taught with scientific inquiry learning model based on conceptual change achieved significantly higher science process skill scores than students taught with conventional learning. → Sahhyar & Nst 2017

Evidence

Sahhyar & Nst 2017

Sahhyar & Nst, F. H. (2017). The Effect of Scientific Inquiry Learning Model Based on Conceptual Change on Physics Cognitive Competence and Science Process Skill (SPS) of Students at Senior High School. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5), 120-126. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133077

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Same quasi-experimental study with 62 students. SPS was assessed via observation sheets across three meetings. Experimental class SPS mean was 79.66 vs 63.97 in control class, with t-test Sig. 0.000. The study reports "students' SPS using scientific inquiry learning model based on conceptual change was better than using conventional learning."

"According to the results given in Table 10, students' SPS using scientific inquiry learning model based on conceptual change was better than using conventional learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.