Claims

Training effects are selective: active control improved processing efficiency but not executive function, and uni/multimodal interventions improved executive function but not processing efficiency

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Active control training produced improvements in processing efficiency but not executive function, while uni- and multimodal interventions improved executive function but not processing efficiency. → Zwilling 2019

Evidence

Zwilling 2019

Zwilling, C. E., Daugherty, A. M., Hillman, C. H., Kramer, A. F., Cohen, N. J. & Barbey, A. K. (2019). Enhanced decision-making through multimodal training. npj Science of Learning 4:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0049-x

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Summary of ANCOVA results across the processing efficiency tests (Pattern Comparison, Letter Comparison, DSST) and the switch cost measure in the RCT. Active control showed reliable gains in Letter Comparison items correct (F = 3.41, p = 0.020) and reaction-time decreases, supporting "improvements in processing ef ficiency, but not executive function".

"First, active control training produced improvements in processing ef ficiency, but not executive function. Second, the uni- and multi-modal interventions improve executive function, but not processing ef ficiency."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.