The pattern of predictive relationships for self-determination differed significantly depending on which measure of self-determination was used¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2010: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Significant differences emerged in the pattern of predictive relationships depending on the measure of self-determination utilized. → Shogren 2007
Evidence¶
Shogren 2007¶
Shogren, K.A., Wehmeyer, M.L, et al. (2007) Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 488-509. https://hdl.handle.net/1808/10983
q2 · i? · associational · r?
In the SEM analysis of the multistate project's baseline data, the article reports that "Significant differences emerged in the pattern of predictive relationships, however, depending on the measure of self-determination utilized." No test statistics are printed in the available text.
"Significant differences emerged in the pattern of predictive relationships, however, depending on the measure of self-determination utilized."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- IQ, psychological empowerment, self-realization, and self-regulation subscale scores contributed significantly to variance in hourly pay, while number of vocational education classes did not — related
- The study targeted students with learning disabilities, mild and moderate mental retardation, and other health impairments — related
- Baseline data from a multistate longitudinal self-determination intervention project were analyzed with structural equation modeling — a broader claim this one bears on
- Capacity, opportunity, and transition empowerment predicted students' self-reported self-determination, but degree of inclusion in general education did not — related
- High wage earners had higher total self-determination, autonomy, and psychological empowerment scores than low wage earners, controlling for intelligence — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-determination-predictor-patterns-vary-by-measure |
title |
The pattern of predictive relationships for self-determination differed significantly depending on which measure of self-determination was used |
description |
The pattern of predictive relationships for self-determination differed significantly depending on which measure of self-determination was used |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
recheck_by |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — shogren-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.