SFAILQ shows high reliability, convergent validity with digital literacy (r = 0.49–0.68), and discriminant validity (HTMT below 0.80)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Internal consistency coefficients for all six dimensions and the total scale exceed 0.85; dimension and total scores correlate with the digital literacy scale at 0.49–0.68; HTMT ratios among the six factors did not exceed 0.80. → Liu Qingqi 2026
Evidence¶
Liu Qingqi 2026¶
Liu Qingqi, Miao Wenjiao, Li Jingjing, Lei Yuju. (2026). The Six-Facet Artificial Intelligence Literacy Questionnaire (SFAILQ): Assessing AI Literacy in Adolescents, Young Adults, and Midlife Adults. Behavioral Sciences, 16(7), 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16071110
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Reliability and validity analysis in Sample 2 (N = 1226): Cronbach's alphas all exceed 0.85, CR values exceed 0.70, AVE values surpass 0.50, √AVE (0.74–0.84) exceeds inter-factor correlations, and inter-dimension correlations ranged from 0.43 to 0.72 without reaching 0.80.
"the scores for both the individual dimensions and the overall AI literacy scale are significantly correlated with the scores of the digital literacy scale, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.49 to 0.68."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The GenAI-SRL scale shows satisfactory reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity across its six dimensions — related
- All SFAILQ dimensions correlate positively with academic self-efficacy (usage skills strongest) and academic engagement (responsible use strongest) — related
- The GAA-LS shows satisfactory-to-strong internal consistency and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity — related
- The survey instrument's nine constructs show convergent and discriminant validity in this sample — related
- TAILS dimensions show high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.90 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
sfailq-reliability-convergent-discriminant |
title |
SFAILQ shows high reliability, convergent validity with digital literacy (r = 0.49–0.68), and discriminant validity (HTMT below 0.80) |
description |
SFAILQ shows high reliability, convergent validity with digital literacy (r = 0.49–0.68), and discriminant validity (HTMT below 0.80) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — liu-qingqi-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.