In a randomised crossover trial, simulation training produced a 22% absolute increase in scores for assessing critically unwell patients versus didactic lectures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? 96% of students performed better when trained with simulation, with an overall 22% absolute increase in scores (95% CI 18-26%) compared to traditional didactic lectures. → McInerney Niall 2022
Evidence¶
McInerney Niall 2022¶
McInerney Niall, Nally D., Khan M.F., Heneghan H., Cahill R.A. (2022). Performance effects of simulation training for medical students – a systematic review. GMS Journal for Medical Education. https://www.egms.de/en/journals/zma/2022-39/zma001572.shtml
q3 · i? · review · r2
Narrative review attributing this to McCoy et al.'s prospective randomised crossover study comparing simulation training to traditional didactic lectures for assessing critically unwell patients (myocardial infarction or anaphylaxis), with performance evaluated in real-time during simulation. The review reports a "22% absolute increase in scores (95% CI 18-26%)"; no standardised effect size was printed.
"96% of students performed better when trained with simulation. Overall, simulation training resulted in a 22% absolute increase in scores (95% CI 18-26%)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Simulation training across medical and surgical scenarios yields significantly higher OSCE scores than didactic lectures across two year groups — a broader claim this one bears on
- 3D visualisation training outperformed traditional teaching on exam outcomes and clinical practice assessment (Shao et al.) — related
- Simulation training improves fundus identification rate and time compared with simulated-patient-only training in a randomised trial — related
- EyeSi virtual reality simulator training produces statistically higher OSCE scores than control in Boden et al.'s randomised trial — related
- Virtual-reality delirium training increased nurses' empathy and knowledge, with larger empathy gains when VR preceded didactic instruction — related
- Adjunctive VR classroom training produces higher validated robotic skills scores than self-directed simulator learning alone in novice trainees — related
- Simulation with patient-specific 3D-printed teeth improved crown preparation quality versus traditional patient care — related
- In a randomised trial of 80 first-year postgraduate oncology trainees, CBL produced significantly higher examination scores and satisfaction than traditional lecture-based learning, though confidence intervals crossed the null for examination results — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.