Claims

Seventh-grade pupils taught chemical content with a virtual laboratory acquired more knowledge than pupils taught without dynamic visualization

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group (mean 32.19) scored significantly higher than the control group (mean 23.02) on the total knowledge test after the experiment (t = 8.850, P = 0.000). → Herga et al. 2014

Evidence

Herga et al. 2014

Nataša Rizman Herga, Milena Ivanuš Grmek, Dejan Dinevski. (2014). Virtual Laboratory as an Element of Visualization when Teaching Chemical Contents in Science Class. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1043246

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental didactic experiment with 109 seventh-grade pupils from five schools (EG n = 62, CG n = 47), March–May 2011, testing knowledge of "Substances, their properties and changes" and "Pure substances and compounds". The t-test showed the EG mean of 32.19 exceeded the CG mean of 23.02, "statistically significant (t = 8.850, P = 0.000)".

"The difference in the arithmetic mean between the pupils in the experimental and control groups was statistically significant (t = 8.850, P = 0.000)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.