Claims

In 82% of studies on transferability, simulation performance was correlated with better operating room performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Of 45 studies focused on transferability of simulation skills to the operating room, 37 (82%) found simulation performance correlated with better operating room performance. → Rahimi A. Masie 2024

Evidence

Rahimi A. Masie 2024

Rahimi A. Masie, Uluç Ezgi, Hardon Sem F., Bonjer H. Jaap, van der Peet Donald L., Daams Freek. (2024). Training in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review of training modalities and objective and subjective assessment methods. Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10915-7

q3 · i? · review · r2

Narrative synthesis of the 45 transferability studies. Operating room performance was assessed in real time or with videos using the GEARS form, and control groups received no simulation training; the review reports "In 37 (82%) of the studies, simulation performance was correlated with better performance in the operating room."

"In total, 45 studies primarily focused on the transferability of simulation skills to the operating room. In 42 (93%) of the studies, the initial training and assessment consisted of virtual training on the dVSS with dVSS metrics as assessment, and dry lab sessions with GEARS assessment."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.