Claims

The course produced no measurable increase in civic engagement or political action, and scores on both were low

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Analyses showed no interaction effects (Fs < 1) and no simple-effect increases in civic engagement or speaking up and acting out. → Schutte et al. 2018

Evidence

Schutte et al. 2018

Ingrid Schutte, Elanor Kamans, Marca Wolfensberger and Wiel Veugelers. (2018). Effects of an International Undergraduate Honors Course on Awareness of Global Justice. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020082

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-posttest with control group using SFS civic engagement (N participants = 18, N control = 16) and speaking up and acting out (N participants = 18, N control = 16) subscales; the valuing social action subscale was excluded due to low posttest reliability. No effect size was printed.

"With respect to civic engagement and speaking up and acting out the analyses did not show that the course had an impact on these forms of motivation to contribute to a more just world. There were no interaction effects Fs < 1, nor did simple effect analysis indicate an increase in civic engagement or political actions, all Fs < 1."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.