The course showed no significant pre-post interaction effects on intercultural sensitivity, with only a marginal endpoint difference on acceptance and adaptation¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? No significant interactions were found for denial and defense (F < 1) or acceptance and adaptation (F < 1) on the ICSSQ. → Schutte et al. 2018 q2 i2 At the end of the course the participant group scored slightly higher on acceptance and adaptation than the control group (F(1,35) = 2.95, p = 0.092, η²p = 0.08). → Schutte et al. 2018 (2)

Evidence¶

Schutte et al. 2018¶

Ingrid Schutte, Elanor Kamans, Marca Wolfensberger and Wiel Veugelers. (2018). Effects of an International Undergraduate Honors Course on Awareness of Global Justice. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020082

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-posttest with control group on combined ICSSQ subscales (denial and defense: N participants = 19, N control = 18; acceptance and adaptation: N participants = 19, N control = 18); simple effects also showed no changes due to participation (Fs < 1).

"The results of the analysis showed no significant interactions for both denial and defense, F < 1, and acceptance and adaptation, F < 1."

Schutte et al. 2018 (2)¶

Ingrid Schutte, Elanor Kamans, Marca Wolfensberger and Wiel Veugelers. (2018). Effects of an International Undergraduate Honors Course on Awareness of Global Justice. Educ. Sci. 2018, 8, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020082

q2 · i2 · causal · r1

Endpoint simple effect on the combined acceptance and adaptation subscale; the printed effect size is η²p = 0.08 (printed as N2p = 0.08), a medium partial eta-squared, but p = 0.092 is marginal. At the start, the control group scored higher on denial and defense (F(1,35) = 5.35, p = 0.027, N2p = 0.13).

"Simple effect analysis did, however, show a difference between the control group and the participant group at the end of the course, with respect to acceptance and adaptation, F(1,35) = 2.95, p = 0.092, N2p = 0.08, such that the participant group scored slightly higher on the more ethno-relativist orientation."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Course participants scored higher on social awareness than controls at the end of the course, though the pre-post interaction was not significant — related
• No statistically significant interaction effects between satisfaction and adaptive feedback on the subsequent pre-actional phase; only marginal trends emerged (H4 not supported) — related
• No statistically significant pre-test sensitization interaction with the CBS treatment was found — a broader claim this one bears on
• A daily learning diary alone (Group D) did not produce statistically significant pre-post gains on any measured outcome in an online mathematics preparation course — related