Claims

The teaching-method effect on achievement interacts with student sex

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The interaction between teaching method and sex significantly affected achievement (F = 8.63, p = .004), with adjusted posttest means of 31.3 for experimental females versus 30.4 for experimental males and 20.9 versus 18.1 in the control group. → Alkhateeb 2015

Evidence

Alkhateeb 2015

DR.PH omar salem alkhateeb. (2015). The Effect of the Six Hats Based on Program in the Development of the Pivotal Thinking of Islamic Concepts Students in Hussein University. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.2. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083817

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Covariance analysis (Table 2) of the same 216-student quasi-experiment reports the Group×sex interaction term with F = 8.63 and significance .004. Table 3 adjusted means show female experimental students at 31.3 and male experimental students at 30.4.

"Group×sex 181.7 1 181.93 8.63 .004"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.