Claims

A six-hats-based training program produces larger achievement gains in Islamic concepts than usual teaching among university students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experimental-group students showed significantly greater improvement on the Islamic concepts achievement test than control-group students (F = 331.85, p = .000), with adjusted posttest means of 30.9 versus 19.5. → Alkhateeb 2015

Evidence

Alkhateeb 2015

DR.PH omar salem alkhateeb. (2015). The Effect of the Six Hats Based on Program in the Development of the Pivotal Thinking of Islamic Concepts Students in Hussein University. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.2. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083817

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental covariance analysis of 216 randomly divided university students (108 experimental, 108 control) taught Islamic concepts in the first semester of 2014/2015. The article reports "the value of P ca lculated (331.85)" as significant at 0.0000, favoring the six-hats group.

"there is a statistically significant difference at the signifi cance level (0.05 = α) in the averages of student achieve ment in the experimental group, and the average stu dent achievement in the control group, the value of P ca lculated (331.85), which is statistically significa nt at the level of (0.0000)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.