Regulation of social activities positively predicts group performance in CSCL inquiry tasks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a multiple regression, regulation of social activities significantly predicted group performance (β=.358, p=.03). → Janssen 2010
Evidence¶
Janssen 2010¶
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2010). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Multiple regression analysis using the four interaction factor scores to predict group performance for 101 groups; regulation of social activities (summed percentages of MSociPlan, MSociMoni, MSociEvl-) was a significant positive predictor, β=.358, p=.03. No effect size beyond β is printed.
"In contrast, regulation of social activities was found to significantly predict group performance ( β=.358, p=.03). This indicates that the more effort group members invest into regulating the process of collaboration, the better they perform as a group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Performing social activities negatively predicts group performance in CSCL inquiry tasks
- Information discussion and regulation of task-related activities did not significantly predict group performance
- The four collaborative-activity factors jointly explain almost 50% of the variance in group performance
- Regulation of social activities positively affected group performance (Janssen et al.) — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Regulation at the dyadic and/or group level is positively related to group performance in CSCL — a broader claim this one bears on
- In CSCL history inquiry, regulation of social activities predicts group performance while social activities are negatively related to group performance — a broader claim this one bears on
- Secondary students in CSCL devote much of their communication to regulating task performance, especially planning the task and monitoring task progress — related
- Both regulation of task performance and regulation of the collaboration process are important for effective CSCL — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
social-regulation-positively-predicts-group-performance |
title |
Regulation of social activities positively predicts group performance in CSCL inquiry tasks |
description |
Regulation of social activities positively predicts group performance in CSCL inquiry tasks |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — janssen-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.