Claims

Learners' mechanical ability and spatial ability were not significantly related to identification performance in the main study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Correlations of mechanical ability and spatial ability with motion and arrangement identification were nonsignificant, so neither was used as a covariate. → Rolf Ploetzner 2021

Evidence

Rolf Ploetzner 2021

Rolf Ploetzner, Sandra Berney, Mireille Bétrancourt. (2021). When learning from animations is more successful than learning from static pictures: learning the specifics of change. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09541-w

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the main study (N = 88), mechanical ability (MeTeV, 12 motion verification tasks) and spatial ability (KFT Subtest N3 paper folding) were assessed as potential covariates; groups did not differ on either (e.g. spatial ability F(2, 85) = 1.16, p = 0.319) and all ability–performance correlations were nonsignificant, so no effect sizes are printed.

"The correlations between the learners' mechanical ability and their identifications of motions as well as between the learners' mechanical ability and their identifications of arrangements were nonsignificant (cf. Table 2). Likewise, the correlations between the learners' spatial ability and their identifications of motions as well as between the learners' spatial ability and their identifications of arrangements were nonsignificant"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id spatial-mechanical-ability-null-relation
title Learners' mechanical ability and spatial ability were not significantly related to identification performance in the main study
description Learners' mechanical ability and spatial ability were not significantly related to identification performance in the main study
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rolf-ploetzner-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.