Visualization format has a large multivariate and univariate effect on identifying motions and spatial arrangements¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 A MANOVA showed the three groups differed significantly on the multivariate level (Wilks lambda = 0.35, F = 28.84, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.407) and on both univariate dependent variables (motions: η2 = 0.552; arrangements: η2 = 0.208). → Rolf Ploetzner 2021
Evidence¶
Rolf Ploetzner 2021¶
Rolf Ploetzner, Sandra Berney, Mireille Bétrancourt. (2021). When learning from animations is more successful than learning from static pictures: learning the specifics of change. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09541-w
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Multivariate analysis of variance (Table 3) on the two dependent measures across the Picture, Four Pictures, and Animation groups: multivariate Wilks lambda = 0.35, F = 28.84, p = 0.000, η2 = 0.407; univariate η2 = 0.552 for motions and η2 = 0.208 for arrangements, both p = 0.000. Mechanical and spatial ability were not entered as covariates because group differences and correlations were nonsignificant.
"On the multivariate level, the investigated groups differ significantly. The effect size is large (cf. Cohen, 1988; Rosenthal, 1994). On the univariate level, the groups differ significantly with respect to the identification of motions as well as with respect to the identification of arrangements. The effect sizes are large"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A pre-study confirmed learners could reliably distinguish the motions and arrangements used as response options in the main study
- Learners' mechanical ability and spatial ability were not significantly related to identification performance in the main study
- Multivariate analysis confirmed a significant overall group effect, and all outcome variables correlated positively in both groups — related
- In the learning phase, group experience and information distribution each produce significant multivariate effects on performance, mental effort, and efficiency, without interacting — related
- Visual fraction models yield more accurate magnitude comparisons than Arabic numeral fractions for all ability groups, but the visual model advantage persists through Grade 8 only for children with MLD — related
- Learning from a single static picture is significantly more successful than learning from an animation or four pictures when identifying spatial arrangements of joined links — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Learning from an animation is significantly more successful than learning from static pictures when identifying the specific motions of a gear mechanism's links — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A re-analysis of a meta-analysis found learning from animations more effective than static pictures only when features of the displayed changes were relevant to learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
manova-omnibus-visualization-format-effect |
title |
Visualization format has a large multivariate and univariate effect on identifying motions and spatial arrangements |
description |
Visualization format has a large multivariate and univariate effect on identifying motions and spatial arrangements |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — rolf-ploetzner-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.