Claims

Training on speed reading strategies (skimming and scanning) significantly improves reading comprehension among second secondary literary students in English language

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Second secondary literary students trained on speed reading strategies scored significantly higher on a reading comprehension post-test than an equivalent control group at α ≤ 0.05. → Mahmoud Sulaiman Hamad Bani Abdelrahman & Muwafaq Saleem Bsharah 2014

Evidence

Mahmoud Sulaiman Hamad Bani Abdelrahman & Muwafaq Saleem Bsharah 2014

Mahmoud Sulaiman Hamad Bani Abdelrahman & Muwafaq Saleem Bsharah. (2014). The Effect of Speed Reading Strategies on Developing Reading Comprehension among the 2nd Secondary Students in English Language. English Language Teaching, 7(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n6p168

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with two intact sections of 21 male students each at Al-Ashrafieh secondary school for boys; the experimental section was trained on skimming and scanning. The article reports a significant post-test difference favoring the experimental group, with the null hypothesis rejected at (α≤ 0.05).

"The results showed that there significant difference between the means of both groups due to the use of speed readin g strategies. As a result of that, the Null hypothesis was rejected at (α≤ 0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.