The SRL-O supports both ten lower-order subscales and two superordinate factors (motivational beliefs and learning strategies)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q3 i? A bifactor model in which items load onto ten specific factors plus two global factors of learning and motivation showed acceptable fit in the validation sample. → Broadbent 2023

Evidence¶

Broadbent 2023¶

Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., Lodge, J. M., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2023). The self-regulation for learning online (SRL-O) questionnaire. Metacognition and Learning, 18, 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09319-6

q3 · i? · design · r3

Secondary bifactor CFA in the validation sample (n = 321) tested 44 items loading onto ten specific factors plus two global factors reflecting learning and motivation; the article reports the fit of this model was also acceptable with CFI = 0.901 and RMSEA = 0.050.

"The fit of this model was also acceptable; χ2(802) = 1435.52, p < 0.001, χ2/df = 1.79, CFI = 0.901, RMSEA = 0.050."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• No existing online SRL questionnaire covers the breadth of motivational beliefs and learning strategies the SRL-O covers
• SRL-O subscales show convergent validity with corresponding MSLQ scales
• The SRL-O has a 10-factor structure covering motivational beliefs and learning strategies for online learners — related
• Metacognition items loaded as a single factor, and time management combined with planning, in the SRL-O structure — related
• Confirmatory factor analysis on FICSMath data confirms the 4C/ID Model's four components fit secondary-tertiary mathematics instructional experiences (CFI = 0.907, RMSEA = 0.050) — related
• Nine of the ten SRL-O subscales showed internal consistency above 0.70, with study environment lower (omega = 0.665) — related