Claims

SSA works differently for different types of students, with particular challenges in helping lower performers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The effects of SSA differ across types of students, and helping lower performers poses distinct challenges. → Panadero 2016

Evidence

Panadero 2016

Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). The Future of Student Self-Assessment: a Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2

q2 · i? · review · r?

Narrative review synthesis: the authors state they "explored how SSA works for different types of students and the challenges of helping lower performers", making differential effects the fifth research topic.

"Finally, we explored how SSA works for different types of students and the challenges of helping lower performers"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ssa-differential-effects-lower-performers
title SSA works differently for different types of students, with particular challenges in helping lower performers
description SSA works differently for different types of students, with particular challenges in helping lower performers
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — panadero-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.