Contributions to socially shared metacognitive regulation were significantly higher in higher performing groups than in lower performing groups (reported finding)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In one reviewed study cited by the review, individual contributions to SSMR in higher performing groups were significantly higher than those in lower performing groups. → Shihui Feng 2025
Evidence¶
Shihui Feng 2025¶
Shihui Feng, Ziyi Wei. (2025). The CoMPAS Framework for Modeling Individual Participation in Collaborative Learning Processes: a Systematic Review. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-025-09450-x
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports, citing Volet et al. (2017), that individual contributions to socially shared metacognitive regulation differed significantly between higher and lower performing groups. The review narrates this second-hand study; no effect size or sample details are printed here, so the claim is reported at the review's level of detail.
"They found that individual contributions to SSMR in higher performing groups were significantly higher than those in lower performing groups, highlighting the importance of individual participation in shared regulation processes"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students reported using the collaboration support mainly for self-regulation of their own contribution rather than for socially shared regulation of the group's participation — related
- SSMR comprised the majority of social MR turns in both less and more successful outcome groups in Australian university veterinary science and American university engineering contexts — related
- In the engineering context, SSMR focus showed an opposite pattern to veterinary science: the less successful group had proportionally more SSMR-High than the more successful group — related
- SSRL-directed question prompts enhanced individual participation in collaborative problem-solving, and socioemotional interaction diversity related to regulation contributions (reported findings) — related
- VMSR occurred at low levels across all groups and contexts — related
- MOR comprised the majority of social MR turns in both less and more successful outcome groups in Finnish senior high school science — related
- American university engineering students showed the opposite foci pattern: the less successful group manifested more high-level MR than the more successful group — related
- Evidence indicates socially shared regulation of learning occurs across SRL areas and may promote learning and performance — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ssmr-contributions-higher-vs-lower-performing-groups |
title |
Contributions to socially shared metacognitive regulation were significantly higher in higher performing groups than in lower performing groups (reported finding) |
description |
Contributions to socially shared metacognitive regulation were significantly higher in higher performing groups than in lower performing groups (reported finding) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — shihui-feng-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.