In the engineering context, SSMR focus showed an opposite pattern to veterinary science: the less successful group had proportionally more SSMR-High than the more successful group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In engineering, SSMR-High was 63.4% of MR turns in the less successful group versus 38.7% in the more successful group. → Iiskala 2021

Evidence¶

Iiskala 2021¶

Iiskala, T., Volet, S., Jones, C., Koretsky, M., & Vauras, M. (2021). Significance of forms and foci of metacognitive regulation in collaborative science learning of less and more successful outcome groups in diverse contexts. Instructional Science, 49, 687–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09558-1

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Table 5 reports SSMR-High at 63.4% of MR turns for the less successful engineering group versus 38.7% for the more successful group, described as "an opposite, though less striking manifestation of SSMR's foci" compared to veterinary science.

"Interestingly, an opposite, though less striking manifestation of SSMR's foci was observed for the engineering students."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• MOR comprised the majority of social MR turns in both less and more successful outcome groups in Finnish senior high school science — related
• American university engineering students showed the opposite foci pattern: the less successful group manifested more high-level MR than the more successful group — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• SSMR comprised the majority of social MR turns in both less and more successful outcome groups in Australian university veterinary science and American university engineering contexts — related
• VMSR occurred at low levels across all groups and contexts — related
• MR of less successful outcome groups focused more on low-level cognitive activity in Finnish high school and Australian veterinary contexts — related
• IMR occurred mainly in less successful outcome groups and was absent or rare in more successful outcome groups — related
• Contributions to socially shared metacognitive regulation were significantly higher in higher performing groups than in lower performing groups (reported finding) — related